The Rangers' pitching, of all things, gives them a really good shot of controlling their own destiny in the race for home field advantage in the first round of the playoffs.
Sep 3, 2010 - Magic Number: 20
Back to harder games. This is also probably the last series the Rangers will play in the regular season where both teams are in direct competition of the same thing. This series will decide the nature of the race to get an extra game at home in the first round of the playoffs. If I may borrow a page from the book of the Great Christopher Fittz, these are the four possible outcomes for the Rangers this series:
It goes without saying, then, that winning this series is likely imperative if the Rangers want to play games one, two and five in Arlington. It will take a sweep to control their own destiny, and a sweep of the Twins in Minnesota, for so many reasons, would have to be one of the biggest moments of the Rangers' season if it happens. Merely taking two of three would make thinks pretty close to a toss-up. Losing the series wouldn't be a death sentence, but it would make things pretty hard. Getting swept would probably mean the only question left in the AL playoffs is which of the Yankees and Rays has to travel to Minnesota to start the playoffs.
It's not exactly a pennant race, but it's the last big series we're likely to have before the games are on TBS, so let's make it fun.
Here are the top five Twins players at Fangraphs.com in Wins Above Replacement, or, in other words, the estimated number of extra wins the Twins have had with them playing than they would have with a roster-filling scrub. If there's a stat you see here that you're not familiar with, make sure to use the friendly links at the bottom.
It hasn't been too long since we last looked at the Twins, so I don't have too many new observations on the elites of their roster. Morneau has finally been passed on the leaderboard by the greatness of Francisco Liriano, though, thanks mostly to a lot of time on the DL.
Probable Twins Lineup
This graph just sizes up both lineups by the probable starters at each spot in the order through the series in weighed On Base Percentage.
The Twins have one of the best offenses in baseball this year thanks in large part to excellent depth. But you'll notice the Rangers beat them at four spots and are very close in three others. The Twins are the better offense (and that's not park adjusted), but when the Rangers are healthy and the Twins don't have Morneau, the Rangers have a really good chance of standing toe-to-toe with Minnesota's offense.
That depth is getting stressed too. Morneau is out for yet another Rangers series, as is Nick Punto. Further, three of the players who have stepped up to make up for their loss are currently injured. Kubel and Hudson haven't played in two days, Thome has only pinch hit in that time. At the moment, I don't know if they're going to play or not. In the interest of being conservative, I'm going to assume they will, but their missing could make a big difference and that's something I'll address later.
Of course, the Rangers have a similar situation. No offense to Andres Blanco, who has been on fire of late, but the news of Ian Kinsler's activation is huge and could mean a lot for the Rangers' chances of seeing at least two guaranteed home games in the playoffs.
Probable Starters
Here is each starting pitcher (and the pens) is compared by Fielding Independent Pitching.
Originally, these pitching match-ups looked pretty close in each game. The Rangers really have the slight pitching advantage when you consider the Ballpark in Arlington skews their numbers a bit, Holland has likely been a bit unlucky on the number of his fly balls that leave the park, and Brian Duensing probably just isn't that good.
But now there are some questions. When I started putting this together, we had our probable starters, but then Duensing and Blackburn both pitched in relief against the Tigers. Last I heard, Carl Pavano would start game one, but there have also been reports of Matt Fox, who has a 4.60 FIP in 123 AAA innings, to make his Major League debut. I still have Blackburn starting a game in the series for these purposes, but it's quite likely someone even worse will go. What's worrisome, though, is the potential for Liriano to come in on short rest in place of Duensing or Blackburn. If he handles short rest well, then the Rangers' pitching advantage likely disappears.
The best case scenario is probably Fox, who is no strong bet to be better than Blackburn, to start the opening game and for Blackburn to show up in game three. That means Pavano is the only starter with a good chance of doing particularly well and Moreland can have the platoon advantage every day.
Blackburn throws mostly low-90s two-seam fastballs and the occasional change and curve. He's good at getting balls in the strike zone, just not at avoiding contact.
Duensing throws fastballs of both four and two seam vareties just over 60% of the time, also in the low 90s and splits the rest of his pitches between slider and change, coming in at an average of 81 and 84 miles per hour respectively. Like most Twins pitchers, he hardly ever surrenders walks.
Pavano is nearly 80% fastballs (low 90s) and change ups (low 80s), splitting the three fairly equally. The rest of the time is a slider and, occasionally -- at least according to Pitchf/x -- a splitter. As is the Twins way, getting two walks off of him is a wild success.
The last part is a fielding estimate between every probable position player in Defensive Runs Saved and Ultimate Zone Rating (pro-rated to 150 games played). Take this with a huge grain of salt, particularly when it's only a season (or less) of information on an individual player. See Mitch Moreland's UZR bar? Yeah, that's mostly misleading.
Anyway, both teams have been fielding pretty well this year. DRS thinks the Twins as a team are much better (close to 30 runs, in fact) while UZR has them pretty close. Their strenght is the infield, while the Rangers boast a strong outfield.
Alright, as far as what to expect from this series, I take each of the previous three components, apply some regression and shove them in to a simulation tool provided by Steve Sommer to get an idea of what's most likely to happen.
Believe it or not, this projects the Rangers as being slight favorites in this series, even on the road, winning 55% of the time. The expected runs scored has Texas at almost exactly 15 and Minnesota at almost exactly 14, and the most common result is the Rangers taking two out of three 40% of the time.
Meaning this here thinks, in three days, it's likely the Rangers will be looking at just a half a game to make up between now and the end of the season to get home field.
And that's probably where our expectations should probably be, slight favorites. But, this uses the probable starters as of Friday night, and we've already discussed some questions there. Here's how some of those changes affect the simulations odds.
Glossary: WAR, DRS, UZR, wOBA, FIP, tERA
3 comments
OpenCalais - Powered by Thomson Reuters
•
Odds Shark 
Photographs by
jamesbrandon,
jdtornow,
phlezk,
flygraphix,
mcdlttx,
tomasland, and
literalbarrage used in background montage under Creative Commons. Thank you.
Comments
My page!
You’ve taken it!
I honestly think the Rangers can win at least two in this series. The pitching match-ups just favor the Rangers (unless Liriano goes) in a way that is practically best case scenario.
SB Nation DFW - Come Read Robbie Griffin's Articles!
by Christopher Fittz on Sep 3, 2010 1:46 PM CDT reply actions
If they can dodge Liriano, I'm thinking sweep.
by Maurice London on Sep 3, 2010 3:55 PM CDT reply actions
I should stop making predictions
by Maurice London on Sep 4, 2010 11:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed